Your Astrology/Tarot

  • Astrology & Tarot May 2013
    Astrology Report by Danielle Benson, president of the Parapsychology Association of Riverside Tarot Report and Tidbit - by Anita Burns May Horoscopes 2013 by Danielle Benson Danielle Benson Aries - …

Your Numerology

Text Size

Subscribe

Stay up to date with The Messenger

How the Physical Universe was Created part 2

Written by  Wynn Free, Terry Brown and the Elohim

Wynn Free, Terry Brown and the Elohim (who, historically were the creators of the physical universe)

Beginning in 2002, while I was in the midst of writing The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce with David Wilcock, a series  of mind blowing episodes began in my life, where a Source which identified itself as the Council of Elohim commenced a communication through 2 consecutive personal relationships  and invited me to ask questions. This article is an excerpt from a free online book - The Creator Gods of the Physical Universe want to talk to you available at www.creatorgodbook.com. There's a lot of deep cellular evolutionary  triggers in these dialogs. I asked a series of questions concerning the creation of the physical universe.  I think you'll find it interesting. Terry Brown was the channel and I've  included a picture below. If you didn't read Part One last month, you might go back and read it (http://www.themessenger.info/content/home/item/1700-how-the-physical-universe-was-created) before reading Part Two. This is pretty deep stuff. You might try reading it more than once:

____________________________________________________________________

Wynn: I want to go back to the “spinningness.” Is the planet earth one “spinningness”

which contains many smaller “spinningnesses” within it? Was it created

in one fell swoop and then added to?

Elohim:  “Spinningness” was created as a joy and a creation in joy, a

wonderment of light energy.  Earth is a collection of “spinningnesses”

that helped congeal the cells and the DNA structure composing

a body which has many “spinningnesses” according to the function of

the aspect of the body. When one “spinningness” fails, that function of

the body it connects with may fold in disrepair and become sick and

dysfunctional.

Wynn:What is the correlation between the “spinningness” and what scientists an atom?

Elohim: The octagon and hexagon, which are three dimensional forms,

are set to spinning; they intersect each other at various intervals. At the

point of intersection, a particle is created. The existence of the particle

blinks on and off as the “spinningnesses” intersect, don’t intersect, intersect

and don’t intersect.

Wynn: Is this an explanation of the quantum-mechanical string theory where something

can be either a wave or a particle?

Elohim: It acts as a particle because it is so fast and because the intersections

weave together into a continuum of what would appear to be continuous

matter. One may also view it as a wave, because as the spinning structures intersect each other, they also create waves moving out in a pattern of lights and darks at the frequency of their repeating intersections, intersecting and reinforcing, intersecting and reinforcing, creating a wavelike function.

Wynn: Is the particle you are describing an atom? How do electrons, neutrons and

photons fit into this?

Elohim: The octagons and hexagons are spinning and intersecting with each other. At some points of intersection, electrons appear; at the other points of intersection are other particles of the atoms.

Wynn: So the real building blocks of the atom are the spinning geometrical structures?

Elohim: The real building block of the atom is the intentionally placed housing of the geometrical structures that then are the subsequent building blocks of the structure as they spin. Are there other questions in the area?

Wynn: When we talk about these hexagons and octagons and “spinningnesses,”

we’re talking about infinitely small geometric relationships. In this realm is

everything built upon these small geometrical spinning forms, or can there

be a large geometrical “spinningness?” If so, what’s an example of that?

Elohim: The example of a large geometrical “spinningness” containing smaller geometrical “spinningnesses” is a galaxy. As you view the picture of the galaxy, it is like a huge pot of soup that one stirs. It starts to spin; in the center it is spinning, and at the edge it is spinning.

Wynn: You mean the picture of the galaxy will look like a spiral?

Elohim: It will take the form of a spiral.

Wynn:Are all galaxies are formed in spirals?

Elohim: There are variations, for instance with two intersecting galaxies, a partial spiral is intersecting another partial spiral.

Wynn: How about what science calls a photon?

Elohim: It is the “spinningness” of congealing light.

Wynn: Is the spirit form composed of “spinningness?” Are the Elohim composed of

“spinningnesses?” Is the one infinite creator an initial arrangement of energy

that became “spinningness?” What is the relationship of “spinningness” to

consciousness?

Elohim: Consciousness implies something to be conscious of which, in turn, implies two. The consciousnesses are many made of one. Motion is required for life to exist. Take, for example, when you have been ill and in bed. When you eventually get better and go out for a drive, say it is the "first time in a month you have been able to drive, the motion is an excitement; your senses wake up; they feel more alive. Motion creates life.

As you move, you move in relationship to something else. As you move in the relationship, you are in a relationship. Relationship is the basis of life. Without a relationship of any kind, we’re back to nothing. Therefore, motion or “spinningness” is a creation of life. i.e “spinningness”in the intention housing is the basis for the spinning factors to relate to each other, i.e., to intersect. In the relationship of the spinning

factors, the motion is established relative to each other, and life is created within the relationship.

Wynn: Is the Elohim composed of “spinningness?” Am I composed of “spinningness?”

If my body is composed of “spinningness,” is there something that exists outside of the “spinningness” that the “spinningness” responds to? In other words when the one Infinite Creator created a huge universe by creating anchor points and putting “spinningness” in it, was he spinningness spinning spinningness, or was he outside of “spinningness?”

Elohim: He is outside of “spinningness. The Elohim is outside of “spinningness.”

You are outside of “spinningness.”

Wynn: So the physical world and all the other dimensional worlds, are made up of

this “spinningness.”

Elohim: That is correct.

Wynn; So I am not “spinningness.” I am the master of “spinningness.” Intentions are

not “spinningness;” intentions control “spinningness.”

Elohim: “Spinningness” responds to intentions, but intentions are created

by the creator who is beyond “spinningness,” beyond anchor points.

He is the creator of those things.

Wynn: That’s why intention is so powerful; it is outside of this world.

ElohimL It is the bridge between this world and the source?

Wynn: Is creativity part of intention?

Elohim: Right. However, you have to have something to be aware of to

be aware.

Wynn: So awareness is a feedback mechanism.

Elohim: Right.

Wynn: Intention is a creation mechanism. Awareness is a feedback mechanism.

Elohim: That is correct.

Wynn: So really, the creator is a major intention divided into minor intentions, and

each one has its own realm of “spinningness.”

Elohim: That is correct. Each tends to degrade as they look lower and their sphere gets smaller and smaller and they forget their origins. 

Wynn: The question still remains how exactly does intention turn into “spinningness?”

Perhaps it is a mystery that cannot be solved. I want to pose the question to see what you come up with. How does that intention leave the source, become independent and suddenly exist as a separate unit independent of its creator?

Elohim: at is a good question. The intention contains within it the intention, the torque and the creation of the projection of the intention. It is a loose nothingness, a desire or passion for a “somethingness” within the sphere of the projection. The source intends a torquing; the torquing spins the projection. The spinning of the projection contains

mathematical configurations within it which alternately, as they are torqued, intersect, stop intersecting, intersect, etc. As they rotate they pass through a cycle. As the geometric creations within the torquing area pass through each other, they create a drag, and this drag begins to light fire, to shine. The shining, then, is a piece of matter, both waveand particle, that can be observed as separate. It is in the torquing that

the motion continues and the life is formed. We may, thus, observe motion.

As the life observes the motion, it feels alive, and it may continue on its own. It feels existence. It is like a soul that experiences existence.

It is like a cordoning off or a sectioning or a focusing of the pre-life, the nothingness that is already there, and it may begin to experience itself and observe other factors within itself lighting up. It begins to feel alive. As such, it can continue on its own.

Wynn: Is this the way the original, one, infinite creator replicated itself the first

time?

Elohim: With great delight, yes. However, replication is not the best choice of words because the creator is, for lack of a better word, different from his creation, therefore God has not replicated itself.

Wynn: Now, the creation of “spinningness” must also incorporate the creation of

time, because once something exists outside of you, time must enter so there

can be a reference point of before and after. Is that correct?

Elohim: Yes, that is accurate. Time comes in when you have a reference

point. No reference point, no time.

Wynn: As soon as you remember something from a previous creation and anticipate

a future creation, there has to be time because suddenly there’s how the creation

was, how it is and how it will be.

Elohim: That is correct.

Wynn: So, when the one in!nite creator projected some creation, suddenly there had to be a future and a past, because something would happen in the future that was different from the present. So, is his creation still part of him?

Elohim: Yes.

Wynn: Thus, he’s not part of his creation in the same way his creation is part of him?

Elohim:He is outside of his creation.

Wynn: Is there an intrinsic difference in the nature of “spinningness” from one dimension to another that’s based on geometric patterns?

There may be interlocking over another dimension, so one can move from one to another. One may be so agile that one can move out of creation, move to another location and reassemble at one of the time portals for instance, as on Star Trek.

Wynn: Is this what these advanced gurus do, who can supposedly bi-locate their bodies?

Elohim: Yes, it is.

Wynn: It is by their intentions.

Elohim: Yes. They are not bound by the laws that other people assume they are bound by; they make their own rules. There is a higher set of principles that one may step into and, by doing so, move in and out of this realm. It is almost a total mastery of the rules of the dfferent realms to know how to walk in and out of them and to unlock the portals.

Wynn: I would assume that one who can do this can be of service to self and to others.

When one has these wonderful powers of moving between realms, one

could also be of service to self only?

Elohim: Yes. An example is Edgar Cayce’s earlier life as John Bainbridge. Totally using his abilities to gain relationships with women and to gain success over card games and over other games, he would play for money. Having stellar psychic abilities to move in and out of Creation portals and be a master in this universe does not mean that one is of

service to others. Many con men have psychic ability. Certain gypsies make a big show of being of service to others, while really they are of service only to themselves. They unlock certain mysteries. They have certain psychic abilities and are, thus, able to break the rules that keep the third density in check.

Leave a comment

COMMENT YOUR HEART OUT. WE LOVE COMMENTS!

We monitor and screen comments and reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain offensive language, hateful comments, or spam.

Also, be sure to enter the (*) required information where indicated. Basic HTML code is allowed.

Banner
Banner

Powerful Sound CDs

Click

Please update your Flash Player to view content.

Please update your Flash Player to view content.

Please update your Flash Player to view content.

Please update your Flash Player to view content.